Home > Meetings > CUR 2002 Workshop Summaries > General Workshops
 
 

CUR 2002 Workshop Report
 
CUR 2002 Planning and Designing Sciences Facilities: Part C

DATE:  Friday June 21, 2002
TIME:  10:45 - 11:30P.M.
TOPIC:  CUR 2002 Planning and Designing Sciences Facilities: Part C
SPEAKERS:  Richard M. Heinz - Vice President / RFD
James E. Swartz - VP for Academic Affairs and Dean of the College / Grinnell College
MODERATOR:  Richard M. Heinz / RFD
REPORTER:  Lilly Archer / RFD
 
  • Presentation Outline

    • Trends in Undergraduate Science Facilities
    • Programming
    • Teaching Laboratory Design
    • Sustainability
    • Building Configuration Issues
    • Grinnell College Noyce Sciences Center - Case Study
    • Benchmarking
       
  • Trends A - Students are Active Participants

    • Hands-on Laboratory Rich Environment
    • Students Become Engaged in Science by Doing Science
    • Less Emphasis on Just Reading Books and Taking Tests
    • Group Activities, Even in the Classroom
       
  • Trends B - Integration of Technology

    • Computers and Wet Benches
    • Laptops - Ready or Not!
    • Computer Focused Lecture
    • Multi-Media, Audio-Visual Technology is Becoming Common Place (in Classroom and Teaching Laboratories)
    • Scientific Instruments are Accessible to Students and Faculty, Often Shared by Teaching and Research Laboratories
       
  • Trends C - Scientific Collaboration

    • Faculty / Student Research Laboratories
    • Student "Project" Space
    • Engage Building Occupants and Visitors in Science with Collections, Displays and Poster Session Space
    • Interaction Outside of the Classrooms and Laboratories
    • Places for Students to Study or Wait for Faculty
    • Spaces to Eat/Drink - Keep Food Outside of Llaboratory!
    • Atrium Spaces Can Help Promote Vertical Interaction
       
  • Trends D - Celebration of Science

    • Incorporation of Scientific Art
    • Put Science on Display with Interior and Exterior Windows
    • Art as Educational Opportunities
       
  • Programming

    • Interactive Programming Process
    • Modular Planning
    • Systems Integration
    • Program 'Deliverables'
       
  • Programming

    • Interactive Programming Process
    • Modular Planning
    • Systems Integration
    • Program 'Deliverables'
       
  • Teaching Laboratory Design

    • Organic Chemistry - alternative layouts and issues:

      • Quantity and Size of Fume Hoods
      • Laboratory Bench Orientation
      • Accommodation of Instrumentation
      • Facilitation of Lecture of Breakout
    • Biology with Moveable Tables - alternative layouts and issue:

      • Distribution of Utilities
      • Laboratory / Lecture
      • Accommodation of Computers
      • Hoods and Sinks
    • General Physics - alternative layouts and issues:

      • Laboratory / Lecture
      • Accommodation of Computers
      • "Workshop" Style Learning
      • Instruments / Flexibility
         
  • Sustainability Issues for Science Buildings

    • LEED II Green Building Rating System

    • Use of Sustainable Materials

      • Wood from 'Certified Sustainably Managed Forest
      • Minimum Requirements for Recycled Steel Content
    • Use of Environmentally Friendly Finishes

      • Water-Borne Application for Wood Finishes
      • Finishes Applied with 'Near-Zero' VOC Emissions
      • No 'Offgasing' of Wood Products after Curing
      • Dry Coating Process for Steel Casework Finishes
    • Variable Air Volume (VAV) Control Systems on Fume Hoods

    • Sash-Limiting Devices on Fume Hoods to Reduce Air Flow

    • Occupancy Sensors for Fume Hoods and/or Room Lighting
    • Heat Recovery System for Fume Hood Exhaust
       
  • Building Configuration - 'Zoned" - most common in large university research buildings

    • Functional Relationships Between:

      • Teaching Laboratories
      • Research Laboratories
      • Laboratory Support Space
      • Offices / Classrooms
    • Organization Factors: 

      • Faculty / Faculty Interaction
      • Faculty / Student Interaction
      • Faculty Monitoring / Mentoring of Student Research
      • Access Vs. Privacy Vs. Security Vs. Safety
      • Utility Infrastructure Between Access & Economy
      • Economy of Construction
      • Flexibility
         
  • Building Configuration - 'Clustered' - more common in small undergraduate environment
     
  • Building Configuration - Addition / Renovation

    • Renovation Challenges & Opportunities:

      • Limitations on Laboratory Module Depth
      • Spacing of Structural Elements Vs. Planning Module
      • Spacing of Windows Vs. Planning Module
      • Floor to Floor Height Vs. Building Systems
      • Organization of Teaching / Research / Support / Office Spaces
      • ADA Accessibility Issues
         
  • Grinnell College Noyce Sciences Center - Case Study

    • Plans, Exterior, Public Spaces, and Classrooms

    • Overall Plan Showing Renovation and Addition Areas

    • Stage I - Second Floor Plan

    • Stage I - Third Floor Plan

    • Stage II - Third Floor Plan

    • Biology Department Layout

    • Chemistry Department Layout

    • Physics Department Layout

    • Prior Conditions and Solutions: 

      • Long peninsula benches created 'dead-ends'
      • Safe exiting hindered with only one way out
      • Faculty access to students was impaired by long peninsulas
      • Collaborative student learning was difficult with long peninsulas
      • Corridors were too narrow to properly accommodate poster sessions
         
  • Benchmarking

    • Net / Gross Area Raio

      • "Great Expectations" Vs. Realistic Goals
      • Impact of Floor Plan Size and Layout
    • Laboratory Support / Laboratory + Laboratory Support Ratio

      • Trends
      • Proliferation of Scientific Equipment
    • Laboratory Density: Total Laboratory NSF / Building GSF

      • Why is this Important?
      • Laboratories are the 'expensive' parts of the building!
      • Higher density of lab space results in higher cost / square foot 
    • Construction Cost / GSF Adjusted To New London, CT 2002

      • Comparative Projects
      • Geographic Acjustment
      • Escalation
         
  • Closing Advice

    • Remember why you are doing the project - It will be a lot of hard work, but it's worth it!
     

 

 
 


Copyright © 2002 Council on Undergraduate Research. All rights reserved.