|
CUR 2002 Workshop Report
CUR 2002 Planning and Building Facilities for
U.G. Research Planning: Part A
| DATE:
|
Thursday June 20, 2002
|
| TIME:
|
2:15 - 3:00 P.M.
|
| TOPIC:
|
CUR 2002 Planning and Building Facilities for U.G. Research Planning: Part A
|
| SPEAKERS:
|
Arthur J. Lidsky, AICP / Dober, Lidsky, Craig & Associates, Inc.
|
| MODERATOR:
|
Julio De Paula / Haverford College
|
| REPORTER:
|
Richard M. Heinz / RFD
|
-
First Steps:
- Start with Mission, Academic Plan, Curriculum & Pedagogy before listing facility needs and before starting design process.
- How should students learn? - What should they know how to do?
- How should science departments approach these questions?
- Then, ask what and how much? Establish priorities.
-
Planning Process: 3-4 year process minimum, even if funding is secured.
- Campus Planning
- Facility Programming
- Schematic Design
- Design Development
- Construction Documents
- Construction
-
Mission and Academic Plan:
- "Process of creating a mission statement is as important as the statement itself."
- Facility needs should be coordinated among departments.
- Don't just fix what is broken, but plan for the future.
- Involve both senior and younger faculty, encouraging active discussion.
- Tour other facilities elsewhere. Learn from others.
-
Curriculum and Pedagogy:
- Plans for new programs?
- Any anticipated changes in graduation requirements?
- Any new majors or minors planned?
- Potential for interdisciplinary activities?
- How should departments be located?
-
Faculty
- Projected FTE by department?
- How much faculty research?
- How much faculty turnover in next 10-15 years?
- Technology Integration
-
Facility Development Strategy:
- New or renovation or combination?
- What goes in new vs. renovation?
- Space Description / Qualification
- Justification / Rationale
- Vision / Intent
- Site
- Space Relationships - Diagrams
- Participating process leading to consensus
- This forms basis of design for the architects
-
Planning Rules of Thumb:
- Net area - Space that are assignable to departments, etc.
- Gross area - includes walls, corridors, toilets, stairs, mechanical space, etc. In addition to net area.
- Net gross ratio - efficiency is impacted by building layout. For science buildings, net gross range is 56-63% Average = 60%
- Space standards - DLC+A benchmarking database for different types of spaces.
- Classrooms - tables/chairs takes more space than tablet-arm chairs.
- Laboratories should be planned on basis of a "planning module", usually around 300-330 nsf per module.
-
Peer Comparisons:
- Net SF per faculty FTE by department (excluding non-departmental classrooms & library space). See where your department stands in comparison to peer institutions.
-
Planning Rules of Thumb:
- Design with assumption that spaces will change.
- Don't design too specifically for the individual, but for the function.
- If cost of renovation approaches 60-70% of cost of new, build new!
- Don't leave a department out
-
Have Fun!!
Questions and Answers - Conclusions:
- Some spaces will be more flexible than others - Organic chemistry laboratories with lots of hoods will be less flexible.
- Stub-out utilities to each room for future use even if not needed initially.
- When does "green" architecture come into the process? Impetus should come from faculty and institution - has potential cost impact, so should be considered early.
- The way a facility works is impacted by relationship between offices and labs.
- When does the issue of "cost constraints" come into process? Should be considered early and often at increasing level of detail / accuracy as planning progresses.
|